Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 23:18
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Graphics
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 69.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 317
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 998
100% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 52.6
34% 43.1 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 23.8
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 137GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,150
Write 1,708
Mixed 1,886
426% 1,915 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 35
112% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 229
150% 179 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
532GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 180 184 191 194 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 164
Mixed 173
SusWrite 183
243% 181 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 14.9
1,199% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 21.8
1,863% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 131%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 16GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback