Today's hottest deals

Pegatron IPMIP-GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardPegatron IPMIP-GS  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 116
54% 86 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 313
28% 234 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2048 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 24.8
15% 22.6 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 20.8
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zadak TWSS3 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 172 66 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 191
Write 148
Mixed 130
SusWrite 102
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 16.9
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 26.3
21% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 96%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
250GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 80.8
Write 84.6
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 84.8
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMIP-GS Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Pegatron IPMIP-GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback