Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '17 at 13:40
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 753
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 75.3
64% 77.3 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 75
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 2,207
Write 998
Mixed 1,128
317% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 23.3
178% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 58.7
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 23.9
42% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 205%
Great: 236%
Lexar MSD USB_3_0 Read 32GB
15GB free, PID b050
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 16.5
21% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.19
14% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback