Today's hottest deals

HP 435 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 435 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3579
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 06:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P360
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 66.3
43% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 66.7
8-Core 67.6
9% 67.1 Pts
64-Core 68.1
4% 68.1 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 3579) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 32 31 22 30 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 52
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 26.1
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 435 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 435 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback