Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory4.8 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 04:27
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 136
56% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 293
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.4
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 194 16 12 17 12 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 248
Write 210
Mixed 205
SusWrite 65.2
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.9
36% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 66.7
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 1
11% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
213GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 97.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 98.9
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 86 87 88 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 82.3
Write 85.3
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 86
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-PB 42GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback