Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C2AQAZXLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-C2AQAZXLM  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2-1
Memory3.7 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 05:51
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 52.4
42% 58 Pts
4-Core 53.6
8-Core 55
7% 54.3 Pts
64-Core 46.7
3% 46.7 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 198 192 204 191 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 204
Write 200
Mixed 183
SusWrite 190
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 12.5
45% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 111
90% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C2AQAZXLM Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2AQAZXLM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback