| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWHA |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20111215 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 16 '22 at 23:49 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | EGY-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
54.5%
Above average
|
57% 91.7 Pts
|
23% 163 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.65
|
0.93%
Terrible
|
1% 0.97 fps
|
1% 1.63 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 40 59 46 24 5.8 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
9% 12.8 MB/s
|
21% 0.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26%
Poor
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
24% 8.2 GB/s
|
48% 82.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 75x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 73x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 174x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 168x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples | 71x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $155 |