Today's hottest deals

AZW Gemini M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW Gemini M  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Gemini M
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 25.5
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 74.5
26% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 138
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 256GB 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2009XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 85 47 26 50 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 418
Write 362
Mixed 329
SusWrite 65.8
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 23.9
97% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 1.4
52% 124 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 93%
SDXC Card 129GB
120GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 6.2 13 20 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 10.5
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 14.3
19% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 29%
WD My Book 1170 3TB
806GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 76.3
124% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Gemini M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback