Today's hottest deals

HP 630 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 630 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3674
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 107
46% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 166
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 17.9
13% 17.1 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.6
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 55 91 91 92 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.3% Average
Read 210
Write 198
Mixed 187
SusWrite 92.5
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 17.7
58% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 135
114% 166 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 94%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
126GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 27
Write 20.4
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 22.3
29% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Micron 16JTF51264JHZ1G6M2 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 630 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 630 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback