Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 20:36
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 125
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 301
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B E134) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ezcool F.B 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: bayfiko
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 53 26 19 19 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB-$40
112GB free
Firmware: SBDOC7DP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 42.4
Write 41.6
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 42.9
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Seagate Portable 500GB
381GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 9.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 23.4
24% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 8.2 7.2 6.5 7 8.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.1
Write 3.7
SusWrite 6.6
11% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback