Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 255%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 307%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 23:42
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$265
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 208
2-Core 416
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1,593
144% 1,209 Pts
64-Core 2,936
182% 2,936 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 340
Reflection 293
Parallax 346
277% 326 fps
MRender 373
Gravity 264
Splatting 186
214% 274 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 225%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm981a NVMe Samsung 1024GB
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15304129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1564 2466 1642 1553 1556 1537 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,534
Write 2,413
Mixed 1,826
SusWrite 1,720
477% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 107
365% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 2,033
DQ Write 1,470
DQ Mixed 1,652
1,261% 1,718 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 397%
Great: 357%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$140
71GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 199 162 162 161 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 471
Mixed 435
SusWrite 221
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 53.8
185% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$226
272GB free
Firmware: O0919A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 436 433 422 423 422 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 413
Mixed 334
SusWrite 428
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.1
170% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 199
168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 151 148 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 167
Mixed 102
SusWrite 152
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
277% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 124 125 127 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 124
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 2.4
488% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 38.9
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 144 31.5" 1280 720 GSM772A LG QHD
Typical GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AERO G DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,039
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback