Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 12:33
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 99
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 377
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 18.8
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 21
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 311 249 213 229 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 322
Write 335
Mixed 280
SusWrite 243
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 27.3
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 196
152% 208 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
624GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 93 95 101 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 79
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 94.1
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
212GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 79.5
Write 81.1
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 80.6
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback