Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 45.4
1-Core 47.8
2-Core 99.4
37% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 86.8
8-Core 99.9
12% 93.4 Pts
64-Core 98.5
6% 98.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Gigabyte(1458 231A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 92.6
57% 71.6 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 72
Splatting 42.1
45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$24
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 49 42 36 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47% Average
Read 333
Write 309
Mixed 282
SusWrite 40.4
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 30.2
91% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 38.6
33% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 49 43 37 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 82.2
Write 34.6
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 41.6
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback