Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$204
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 278
78% 150 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 544
41% 368 Pts
64-Core 2,110
131% 2,110 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 40.2
35% 42.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.1
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 699 529 526 530 533 532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 812
Mixed 312
SusWrite 558
152% 682 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 350
260% 339 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 124%
Great: 277%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
65GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.1% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 38.4
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 37.9
9% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 8.5
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 24.9
20% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
203GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
237GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 77 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 77.8
Write 75.9
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 76.3
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
58GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 97.4
Write 122
Mixed 63
SusWrite 120
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
101GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 65 63 8.6 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 62.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 55.1
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 40%
Generic MassStorageClass 248GB
167GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 83 83 79 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 64.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 82.3
77% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.9
202% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 40.1
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 28.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback