Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP63 Leopard 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 01:23
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 684
68% 554 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 63.6
51% 66.5 fps
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 62.8
56% 62.8 fps
Poor: 35% Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 62 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 369
Write 96.8
Mixed 183
SusWrite 59.8
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 20.9
73% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 129
116% 183 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 107 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 105
65% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 20.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback