PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 09KPNV |
Memory | 21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130528 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 30 '22 at 09:38 |
Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
Run User | COL-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 159 165 165 164 164 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
50GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 160 163 165 165 165 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
Kesu USB 3.0 120GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 101 105 102 102 103 MB/s
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 143 146 147 147 146 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 4.6 7.8 6.4 6.7 7 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3530Intel $287Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 493x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 338x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 247x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 157x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 130x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $371 |