Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30BFS9C900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30BFS9C900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1036
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 01:35
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 784
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 1038
64% 1038 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.56
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.2 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 22.1
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2094 2085 2080 2076 834 622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,128
Write 2,094
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 1,632
419% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 67.3
236% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,122
836% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 307%
Great: 347%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2080 2097 2103 2105 2080 2056 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,886
Write 1,873
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 2,087
420% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 69.4
240% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,256
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1,167
877% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 329%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 216 218 220 219 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7DJR8N-WM 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 29.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BFS9C900 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30BFS9C900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback