Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 213
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 694
64% 537 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 49.2
Parallax 48.8
39% 48.5 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 38.5
33% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 418 431 426 420 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 444
Mixed 371
SusWrite 414
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 46.5
158% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$42
287GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 36 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 31.4
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 36.1
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 60%
Wilk USB DISK 3.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 11 12 19 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 80.9
Write 4
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 12.5
26% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.9
229% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R748G2400U2S-UO 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback