Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 00:00
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 347
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,299
118% 994 Pts
64-Core 2,868
178% 2,868 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
EVGA(3842 4755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (75 fps cap detected)
61.2% Good
Lighting 75
Reflection 75
Parallax 75
61% 75 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 75
Splatting 75
61% 75 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 49 49 50 51 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 492
Mixed 414
SusWrite 61.2
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 50.9
181% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 121%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
28GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,534
Write 702
Mixed 513
200% 917 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 48.8
202% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 422
372% 560 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 223%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
118GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 111 99 102 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 46.8
Write 77.9
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 103
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST2000DM009-2G4100 2TB
119GB free
Firmware: DN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 97
Write 102
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 92.4
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 32.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 32.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TORPEDO (MS-7C91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback