Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 71
2-Core 118
56% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 160
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 7
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUT10101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 181 135 128 148 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 368
Write 132
Mixed 306
SusWrite 140
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 17.2
55% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 83.4
86% 148 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-B Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback