Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 23:32
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,119
105% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,608
100% 1,608 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 189
Parallax 217
163% 202 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 195
Splatting 156
159% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 1133 1080 1022 991 973 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,699
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,441
SusWrite 1,110
420% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 101
341% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,617
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 1,394
1,052% 1,417 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 345%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 296 294 294 293 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 485
Mixed 412
SusWrite 314
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.4
218% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 336
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
324GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 496 435 230 324 320 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 488
Mixed 395
SusWrite 382
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 42.4
161% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 200
185% 286 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
391GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 454 189 107 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 454
Mixed 376
SusWrite 234
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 41.3
154% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 212
185% 274 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 191 193 192 192 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 159
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 191
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
486GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 101
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 88.7
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 29.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 35.6
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 3,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback