Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210519
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '22 at 01:16
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 788 70% 591 Pts	64-Core 1,578 98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3704) 2GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.1% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 29 22% 31 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 28.8 Splatting 27 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0521A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 356 177 269 177 179 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,496 Write 1310 Mixed 1,019 SusWrite 254 227% 1,020 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 22 137% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 415 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 239 187% 266 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 234%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 332GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 80 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 72.4 Write 77.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 80.4 52% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 478GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 162 161 162 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 139 Write 129 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 161 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 30 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 20.8 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.3 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback