Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-E2500N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E2500N  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 11
2-Core 39.8
18% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 39.7
8-Core 41
5% 40.3 Pts
64-Core 40.6
2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.9.2
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 140 153 147 155 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 363
Write 336
Mixed 311
SusWrite 151
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 27.2
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 88.3
62% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E2500N Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E2500N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback