Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 11:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 120
47% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 194
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 14.4
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 7.9
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax GX0120L9A250-E1 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 129 117 111 115 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 399
Write 116
Mixed 135
SusWrite 113
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 17.7
89% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 20.8
22% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
425GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 187 165 192 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 164
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 183
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88B7 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0- 4GB
1333, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback