Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro9,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro9,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-6F01561E16C75D06
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 92.3
33% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$117
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AUF02A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 53 34 21 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 68.4
Mixed 73
SusWrite 39.4
40% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 6.4
1,107% 7.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 18.9
163% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro9,2 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro9,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback