Today's hottest deals

HP 245 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 245 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8305
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 07:34
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-3350B APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 43.4
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 56
29% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 109
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 8305) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.9
1% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 271 272 255 152 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 284
Write 268
Mixed 258
SusWrite 228
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 26.4
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 170
119% 147 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 245 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback