Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 00:32
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 831
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 117
Parallax 124
106% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.6
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,384
Write 1,212
Mixed 991
266% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 60.7
198% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 272
341% 596 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 119 126 126 126 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 52.4
Write 56.2
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 124
45% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 27.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 29.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z590M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback