Today's hottest deals

HP 510-p127c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 510-p127c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 822A
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 20:11
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 137
56% 94 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 225
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360
Device(1B0A 90F4) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 15.1
9% 14.4 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11.5
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 65 31 42 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 106
Write 137
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 51.6
70% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 16.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 510-p127c Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 510-p127c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback