Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 184
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 360
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 31.6
18% 29.5 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 24.1
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 14 108 13 48 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 468
Write 389
Mixed 331
SusWrite 80.4
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 16.4
80% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 22.8
71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 91%
V-gen09sm20ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
106GB free
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 379 390 393 396 396 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 473
Write 382
Mixed 374
SusWrite 370
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 24.4
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 34.5
79% 157 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3M8GL16B8 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback