Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80QQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime13 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration573 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4288U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 54
2-Core 19.4
41% 51 Pts
4-Core 78.7
8-Core 90.8
11% 84.8 Pts
64-Core 44.3
3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 39FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0
3% 1.7 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.9 11 12 8.1 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 13
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 9.2
6% 7.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback