Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-722

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-722  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-722
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime22.4 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 23:53
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 65.7
35% 53 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 118
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 097D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1004
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 183 95 86 87 96 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 322
Mixed 313
SusWrite 125
47% 203 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 5.7
55% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 167
134% 188 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-722 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-722

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback