Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210130
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 23:39
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 541
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
27GB free
Firmware: T0707A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,556
Write 1,095
Mixed 933
264% 1,195 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 27.6
169% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 462
390% 572 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 234%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 82 79 92 84 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 81.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 83.3
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5428-002.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 3R 1G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 43% 35 310 246 60 0" 1920 1080
History: Score 36: 3R 4G 9B | Score 29: 3R 1G 11B
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback