Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 3020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3020  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 170
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 341
48% 352 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$301
Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 170
Parallax 159
0% 110 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 37 47 36 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 10.4
Write 58.3
Mixed 28
SusWrite 36.1
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 69%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 250GB
151GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 7.5 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 6.8
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 8.7
6% 7.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 42%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 7.5 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.14% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 7.2
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 8.6
6% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Jmicron Generic DISK02 240GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 7.5 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.52% Terrible
Read 7
Write 7.4
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 8.7
6% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Jmicron Generic DISK03 1TB
290GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.6 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Read 6
Write 6.2
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 8.7
5% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 70%
Lexar JD FireFly 2GB
1GB free, PID a761
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.7
6% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 16GB
1600, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3020 Builds (Compare 6,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback