PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 3020 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 3020 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140414 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 04 '22 at 19:26 |
Run Duration | 295 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$301
Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 37 47 36 34 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Jmicron Generic DISK00 250GB
151GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 7.5 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
|
4.6%
Terrible
|
|||
5.14%
Terrible
|
||||
4.52%
Terrible
|
||||
Jmicron Generic DISK03 1TB
290GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.6 10 9.9 10 10 MB/s
|
4.21%
Terrible
|
|||
Lexar JD FireFly 2GB
1GB free, PID a761
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
|
3.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 16GB
1600, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 2,450x |
Core i5-4570Intel $65Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 1,541x |
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples | 508x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1,808x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 670x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 515x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $228 |