Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 66
43% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 164
19% 150 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 26.1
20% 23.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.2
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 50 39 30 44 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 376
Write 295
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 67.2
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 1.1
51% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 91
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 16.9
22% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 82%
WDC WD20 EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 229 204 232 224 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 198
Write 203
Mixed 107
SusWrite 221
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.3
70% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
WDC WDS 500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
208GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 347 290 353 335 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 376
Write 324
Mixed 229
SusWrite 326
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 42.9
139% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 174
145% 210 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 11.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback