Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 04:50
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 238
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 765
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 140
Splatting 142
116% 141 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 113%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 333
Mixed 368
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 43
145% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
53GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,898
Write 1,237
Mixed 643
276% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56.4
196% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,256
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 464
433% 696 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Jajs600m 2TB 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: U012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 399 399 413 416 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 474
Write 399
Mixed 350
SusWrite 402
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 30.2
125% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 48
66% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
WD Se 1TB (2013)
303GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 158 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 82.1
Write 87.4
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 158
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 33.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 28.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback