Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 64
2-Core 128
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 394
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 95.7
Parallax 60.8
52% 73.5 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 60.9
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 743
Write 302
Mixed 57.1
79% 367 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 18.6
102% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 51.3
69% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 106%
BT58SSD08S 128GB
43GB free
Firmware: 1105V54P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 372 119 59 55 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 456
Write 377
Mixed 338
SusWrite 169
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 10.7
81% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 16.2
56% 116 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 76%
BT58SSD09S 240GB
161GB free
Firmware: 2010232P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 213 211 213 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 237
Write 212
Mixed 203
SusWrite 213
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 12
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 18.2
47% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback