Today's hottest deals

Biostar B45M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar B45M2  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200102
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700E APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 83.7
30% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 139
20% 143 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.36
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 8.7
4% 6.53 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 5.6
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 63 64 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 86.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 62.2
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
224GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 101 101 101 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 98.1
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G240081 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.2
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B45M2 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar B45M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback