Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 655 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 655 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 40.1
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 47.5
28% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 66.7
8-Core 94.1
10% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 85.6
5% 85.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.3
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 141 40 39 56 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 389
Write 280
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 95.4
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.9
22% 6.83 MB/s
DQ Read 69.7
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 13.9
18% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
121GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 61 71 67 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 73.1
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 66.4
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 655 G1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 655 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback