Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 14:11
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6420K APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 91.2
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 106
58% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 97.7
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 96.6
6% 96.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 55 55 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 132
Write 54.4
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 67.4
18% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.9
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 32GB
23GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 19
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 11.3
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.1
219% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
10GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.6 3.5 4.2 5.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 10.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4.3
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 2.6
111% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback