Today's hottest deals

NEC PC-VK24LAZNF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNEC PC-VK24LAZNF  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC AR1CR
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120921
Uptime79.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
Micro-FCPGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 92.2
1-Core 49
2-Core 90
52% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 146
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 6005) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$15
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.7 17 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 64.2
Write 52.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 15.7
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 54%
USB Disk 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 7.3 15 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 14
13% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-VK24LAZNF Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: NEC PC-VK24LAZNF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback