Today's hottest deals

ZMAX I3000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZMAX I3000  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH61R3
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 191
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7B97) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AEX
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 33 39 42 23 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 4.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 28.8
14% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DATEN 4GD13 08/13 857F 9905458-009.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical I3000 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: ZMAX I3000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback