Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20BMS02F00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BMS02F00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BMS02F00
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 47.2
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 40.8
25% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 39.5
8-Core 39.4
5% 39.5 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Legend(17AA 2219) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 94 89 88 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 42.6
Write 43
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 91.6
36% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 72%
Flash USB Disk 16GB
10GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 3.3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 20.7
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.7
137% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback