PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130510 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 17 '22 at 18:18 |
Run Duration | 289 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 86 86 83 86 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 293 291 290 293 300 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
283GB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 15 15 15 16 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770KIntel $150Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 1,312x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 400x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $93Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 397x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 173x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 167x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 162x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $723 |