Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory41.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$122
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,160
109% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,621
100% 1,621 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 288
Parallax 321
249% 305 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 255
Splatting 185
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 208%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,990
Write 2,254
Mixed 1,762
448% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 78.7
282% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,299
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1131
855% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$100
386GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2056 1718 1717 1714 1722 1724 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2006
Write 2,256
Mixed 1,839
SusWrite 1,775
444% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 77.5
268% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1,202
904% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 326%
Great: 347%
WD easystore 25FC 1TB
650GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 62 65 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 94
Write 89.8
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 63.5
100% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 24.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 22
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $974
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback