Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 78.3
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 39.2
8-Core 91.2
8% 65.2 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1844 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 20.6
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 21
Splatting 18.8
16% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.77 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 77 71 52 65 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.5% Very poor
Read 102
Write 81.5
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 69.7
18% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 8.1
31% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 13.4
10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 86%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
58GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 292 262 276 147 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 263
Write 313
Mixed 262
SusWrite 234
61% 268 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 21.7
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 32.5
28% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$52
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 76 70 56 66 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 151
Write 131
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 67.6
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 7.3
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback