Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8940

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8940  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KV3RP
Memory38.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 20:58
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 970
90% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,522
94% 1,522 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Dell(1028 1365) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 77.8
66% 79.5 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 61.1
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 153 205 156 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 462
Write 148
Mixed 163
SusWrite 162
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 21.4
99% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 148
121% 175 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 128%
Nvme PM991 Samsu 256GB
222GB free
Firmware: 25307039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 922 277 185 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,399
Write 889
Mixed 991
SusWrite 446
207% 931 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 56.3
194% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 554
447% 618 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 172%
Great: 169%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 166 174 173 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 134
Write 45.7
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 169
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 6.3
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
702GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 165 165 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 156
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 165
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2J1 029E000080CE CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 029E000080CE CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3200, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 18.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8940 Builds (Compare 10,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO

System: Dell XPS 8940

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback