Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-WW
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 12:30
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 166
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 281
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 106
Parallax 110
93% 110 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 89.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 261 255 254 250 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 383
Write 262
Mixed 229
SusWrite 254
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 33.8
123% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 232
194% 286 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
519GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 24.2
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 26.8
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB-$19
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.2
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-WW-CF Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback