Today's hottest deals

Asrock H270 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H270 Performance  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 04:12
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 165
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 444
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$130
Asus(1043 86C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 51.4
48% 56.6 fps
MRender 43.5
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 48.1
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 27 116 7.8 12 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 307
Write 5.7
Mixed 152
SusWrite 62.5
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 0
3% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 96
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 93.9
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1127WH.006 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 Performance Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback