Today's hottest deals

DEXP Desktop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDEXP Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful C.A68M-K PLUS
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160723
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 03:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 103
44% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 102
16% 113 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer A S350 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 84 75 64 50 57 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 266
Write 210
Mixed 106
SusWrite 74.4
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 13.6
36% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 70.8
45% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
689GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 168 166 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 167
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 167
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R5S34G1601U1S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: DEXP Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback