Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 04:45
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 95.7
47% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 94.2
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 92.2
6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 45 125 71 90 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 394
Write 335
Mixed 12.6
SusWrite 91.2
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 157 153 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 155
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 156
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback